Categories
Life’s never ending journey ….
Life’s never ending journey….
Share
May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Mar    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Archive for the ‘Articles’ Category

Child protection: why did this woman lose her children?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8010941/Child-protection-why-did-this-woman-lose-her-children.html

Child protection: why did this woman lose her children?

A new case in south London highlights the ongoing scandal in our social services, reports Christopher Booker.

By Christopher Booker
Published: 6:50PM BST 18 Sep 2010

161 Comments

Mother and child

Mother and child are often torn apart by our system of child protection Photo: Alamy

Nine days ago six policemen, three psychiatric workers and three social workers from the local council arrived outside a house in south London, threatening to beat the door down unless they were given entry. Inside were a mother and her two terrified children, aged nine and 11. Once inside, they removed the mother to a psychiatric hospital under the Mental Health Act, and gave the children to her estranged husband, a solicitor, from whom she parted some years ago because she didn’t consider his promiscuous lifestyle compatible with bringing up two young daughters.

What had this mother done to be robbed of her children and incarcerated alongside psychotics who were drugged to the eyeballs? There is no accusation that she has in any way harmed her daughters, who have been frenziedly texting her asking why they can’t be allowed to come home.

Her problems with the authorities seem to have started some years back when, after the death of her oldest child in a famous hospital, she began writing letters of complaint – first about the hospital, then about other public employees with whom she subsequently had dealings, including social workers and the police.

It became clear to her that they thought she was suffering from a persecution complex. In May, she was called on her mobile by a psychiatrist who asked whether she heard voices. She calmly replied: “The only voice I hear is yours down this telephone.” Last week, she was interviewed in the mental hospital by another psychiatrist. After receiving nothing but sane replies, the baffled expert finally said: “I’ll have to ask the social workers what’s wrong with you.”

Since no court proceedings have been brought against the mother, who has a BSc from a London university, I am free to report all the details of this bizarre case. The decision not to identify those involved is my own. But it would be interesting to know how the council’s social workers think they can justify why she is being held against her will, and why they have handed over her children to someone who doesn’t immediately seem more suitable to care for them than their devoted mother. I shall follow this very odd story until the children are returned to where they obviously wish to be.

Share

Each of us feared the other had beaten our baby

http://www.mirror.co.uk/life-style/real-life/2010/09/09/each-of-us-feared-the-other-had-beaten-our-baby-115875-22547119/

Each of us feared the other had beaten our baby

By Alice Wright 9/09/2010

Yourlife 09.09.10 Cassi Guild

When Cassie Gould and Wayne Halligan took their sick son to hospital they were falsely accused of harming him – then began 11 months of hell as they tried to get their baby back.

CASSIE, 23

Nobody can describe the pain of having your child taken away from you – it’s like someone putting a knife in your heart and turning it again and again.

Nobody could comfort me, nothing could take away my grief. Last year, we took our baby Cavern to hospital when we found he wasn’t feeding properly and had developed little spots in his ear. To our horror, doctors said he had been shaken. From that moment our lives changed forever.

Before that, I’d loved every moment of motherhood – even getting up in the nights to feed him. It had given my life a new joy and purpose. But without him there, I woke up every ­morning with a heavy heart.

My partner Wayne tried his best but I was so angry and frustrated I pushed him away.

I even started drinking at weekends to try and forget. Of course it didn’t work – after two bottles of wine I’d sit there weeping, frustrated that I was powerless to get him back. Doubts crept in about my abilities as a mother – had I bounced him too hard in his bouncer? Had I done something without realising it? Worse, I began to suspect Wayne of harming him, even though I knew he was a devoted dad.

Then after 11 months separated from our child, doctors confirmed he had a medical condition called hydrocephalus (water on the brain) that had caused the symptoms.

Now we’ve got our little boy back but I’ll never be the same – when social services took my baby away they broke me. I’m still suffering.

We’d taken him to Selly Oak Hospital in Birmingham last March ­after we found little spots in his ears and he ­refused to eat – and he was ­referred to ­Birmingham Children’s Hospital. Doctors there did tests and found Cavern had suffered a bleed on the brain. They asked if he’d been dropped, or if someone had hurt him, we were shocked. Of course not! He was in for three days and we sat by his bedside, before social workers came in with the police. They told us Cavern had been ­diagnosed with Shaken Baby ­Syndrome and we were under ­suspicion.

As we were led away I sensed the eyes of other parents on the ward following us ­accusingly and I broke down. Wayne was cautioned and questioned by police that same day but I was in too much of a state to talk to them until weeks ­later.

Outside the hospital I called my mum, sobbing while I told her what had happened. She couldn’t believe it, and stood by me over the next awful months.

For three months Cavern was in ­hospital, but we couldn’t stay with him on our own – we had to be supervised.

At home his toys ­were everywhere but the flat was silent without him. I was a wreck and couldn’t face family and friends. What would they think? I’d babysat for their children! People distanced themselves from me – that hurt even more because it seemed they’d decided I was guilty. Wayne didn’t cry – he didn’t break down once and, mistakenly, I suspected he didn’t care. I knew he wasn’t capable of harming our child but how could he be so ­unfeeling?

I lashed out over and over again – I never accused Wayne outright but he knew what I was thinking. Sometimes I looked at him and knew he was wondering the same about me. At one point the pressure got too much and we split for a few weeks.

After three months, Cavern was ­discharged and went to live with Roisin, Wayne’s sister – I was pleased he was with family but I was missing the milestones.

I missed his first tooth, the moment he started crawling and his first words. While Roisin was looking after Cavern he was taken back to hospital where doctors found he’d suffered another bleed on the brain.

Our child protection officer called an emergency meeting where one doctor ­suggested Cavern might have ­hydrocephalus, which can cause bleeding. It was terrible to hear my son had a ­serious medical condition but I was ­overjoyed to have an explanation. And I was angry doctors hadn’t said anything to us about the condition before. I thought the nightmare would end there, but one doctor wasn’t convinced.

Police dropped the case but social ­services didn’tso we still couldn’t take Cavern home. Then Roisin’s daughter ­became ill so Cavern had to be moved again – this time he went to live with my mum. I still saw him every day but when he cried, he reached out his arms to my mum for comfort, not me. That hurt a lot. I was scared he’d begin to forget I was his mummy.

Despite everything Wayne stayed strong. I could see he was traumatised – he lost a stone in weight – but he never showed his hurt. It wasn’t until December that all the doctors agreed he had hydrocephalus and in January this year a judge ordered social services to hand him back. It was only when we got on the bus to go home that it started to sink in. I was grinning and crying at the same time.

I hadn’t lost my bond with Cavern but it was difficult getting back into the routine. He left a baby and came back a toddler.

I’m still trying to make that time up. Wayne and I are rebuilding our ­relationship. What we’ve been through will stay with us the rest of our lives – I thank him now for his strength in those terrible days. He kept this family together.

I want to get on with my life but it’s easier said than done. If I have to take Cavern to hospital now, I’m wary and mistrustful of so-called experts. I cry at the smallest thing and feel I’m forever looking over my shoulder. I should have enjoyed every moment of my son’s first year – instead it was a living hell.

WAYNE, 25

I couldn’t believe we were accused of battering our baby.

That whole period is a terrible nightmare I kept hoping I would wake up from.

We were really enjoying being new parents – then it all came crashing down. While Cavern was in hospital I was getting up at 6.30am, doing a full day at work as a builder and then going to the ward. I was exhausted but at least at work I didn’t have to face the accusing eyes of people who suspected I’d beaten my baby.

I knew I hadn’t injured Cavern, so I couldn’t help wondering if Cassie had. It’s horrible to think about now but when experts say your baby’s been abused you can’t help those feelings creeping in. Cassie and I were arguing so much I moved out for a while.

One minute we were a happy family, the next we’d been torn apart. I felt so powerless – it was like I’d been paralysed.

It was the biggest shock of my life when, in January, the judge finally said we could have Cavern back.

For 11 months we’d been accused of beating our child, then, just like that, it was all over. I wanted to demand an apology for everything we’d been through.

Having Cavern back is fantastic but I’m not sure about having more kids.

There’s no way I could go through that again


Share

Brother and sister who had child together to get married… despite knowing incestuous wedding is illegal

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1311238/Brother-sister-didnt-know-related-marry–despite-knowing-union-illegal.html

Brother and sister who had child together to get married… despite knowing incestuous wedding is illegal

By Valerie Hanley
Last updated at 1:40 AM on 12th September 2010

A brother and sister who had a child together are to break the law and marry later this month, the Irish Mail on Sunday can reveal.

They first spoke to the newspaper in May about their shock on discovering that they shared a father and were involved in an incestuous relationship.

And even though the couple – known as ‘James’ and ‘Maura’ – realise it is illegal for them to marry, they say they are still determined to spend the rest of their lives together and will break the law to do so.

Sibling marriageForbidden love: James and Maura met and fell in love completely unaware that they shared a father. They have since had a child together

This weekend, the couple, whose identities the Irish Mail on Sunday has protected by changing their names, as well as those of their close relatives, spoke about their wedding plans.

James said: ‘We have applied to get married and there are no mistakes in the paperwork so we will be able to wed at the end of this month.

‘We were aiming for Christmas but we have decided to do it sooner. Maura has got her wedding dress, we’ve ordered identical suits for myself and our son. We’ve also ordered a cake and we plan to go on a honeymoon a few weeks after the wedding.

‘It will be a very small wedding. We have two witnesses who we know very well and they know about our situation. I don’t know whether our father will come or whether any of our parents will be there.

‘Our son is getting excited about the wedding. He knows what is happening. As for Maura and me, it hasn’t really sunk in yet that we’re getting married.’

In a story that made headlines around the world, James and Maura revealed how they met and fell in love completely unaware that they shared a father.

The couple, who hailed from different towns, about 100 miles apart, were both out with friends when they met in a nightclub in a third town several years ago.

Siblong weddingRisking everything: The couple know marriage is illegal, but want to go ahead regardless

So strong was their mutual attraction that just one week after meeting, they both felt they had known each other for a lifetime.

Two years later, Maura became pregnant and the couple moved in together. Later that year their son, Mark, was born. By then James’s fraught relationship with his mother, Carmel, was nearing breaking point.

He had not seen Vincent – the man he had been brought up to call ‘father’ – for several years. Vincent, with whom James had a strained relationship, had left the family home when James was aged about 10 or 11.

In the years that followed that separation, James’s relationship with his mother deteriorated.

Maura, who had enjoyed a happy family background, encouraged James to make peace with his estranged mother and he called to her house just before last Christmas.

But, as his mother questioned James about his partner’s background, she became agitated and cut short the meeting, saying she could no longer speak to him. Mystified, James left the house.

A few days later, she made contact with the devastating news that Maura’s father was also his own father.

Since Christmas, with the help of DNA tests and gentle questioning, James and Maura have discovered the following: On a night out in the Eighties, Carmel, then aged 19, met Tom, and the pair dated for four or five weeks before going their separate ways.

However, after discovering she was pregnant with James, Carmel opted not to tell Tom she was expecting his child.

By the time James was born, she was in a relationship with Vincent, and it was he who she named as James’s father on the baby’s birth certificate. It was not until about four years later that Tom discovered Carmel had had a child.

Keen to find out whether he was the boy’s father, he made contact. Many of the details about what happened next are sketchy. However, what is clear is that even though Tom was by now married and the father of a daughter, he was determined to be a part of his son’s life and embarked on a legal battle to win access.

However, it was the Eighties and court cases like this were few and far between. But Tom was undeterred and, when the case was heard behind closed doors, Carmel admitted that Tom was indeed James’s biological father.

However, the court ruled that James should not be told who his real father was, and that Tom should not be given access to the young boy.

Now, even though James and Maura are half-brother and sister, they are determined to get married. They say they have no qualms about breaking the law after James’s biological father was denied access to him.

James said: ‘The way I see it, if the system can know about things and hide the facts, then I can do the same. They turned a blind eye and so can we.

‘People can criticise and say it is not right but they should say the same about what was done to me in the family law courts.’

Share

How could couple who went on run with four-year-old be allowed to foster any child?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1308832/How-couple-went-run-year-old-allowed-foster-child.html

How could couple who went on run with four-year-old be allowed to foster any child?

By Claire Ellicott
Last updated at 10:30 AM on 4th September 2010

A foster mother who went on the run with a four-year-old boy she hoped to adopt was being questioned by police yesterday.

Officers arrested Marcia Langton, 46, after finding her and the child at the end of a two-day hunt.

They are still looking for her 40-year-old husband Darren, who is awaiting trial for an alleged attack on a neighbour.

Last night questions were being asked as to why the boy, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, had been placed with an apparently unsuitable couple.

The Langtons were even being considered for suitability to adopt children.

Social workers had been concerned about the boy’s safety and had started court proceedings to return him to their care.

The Langtons vanished with the child hours before they were due to hand him over to the authorities. He had been with them for 16 months.

Mr Langton, a self- employed planning consultant, has not been seen since Sunday, but is believed to be in the Skegness area of Lincolnshire.

Police found his wife and the four-year-old in Doncaster at about 7pm on Thursday.

She was arrested and taken back to Skegness police station to be interviewed by officers.

The boy had been living with the couple at their semi-detached home in Doncaster where neighbours were led to believe they had already adopted the youngster.

The family are thought to have moved on from there to Skegness two months ago.

The couple had been due to hand the boy back to social services officials at Newham Borough Council in east London on Tuesday and police were alerted when they failed to turn up.

A council spokesman said serious concerns had prompted it to take court action to return the child to their care.

The council insists that, according to its own records, the couple had no criminal record when the boy was handed over to their care.

A spokesman said: ‘The child was placed with the couple 16 months ago. They were being considered as suitable adopters.

‘In recent weeks, we were made aware of serious concerns which led us to take court action to return him to our care.’

It is unclear why the boy was placed with a family so far from his London home but a source close to the case said sometimes children were moved ‘for very good reason’.

Mr Langton is due before Doncaster Magistrates on September 13 for a committal hearing relating to an alleged assault on Wayne Taylor, 35.

Lib Dem MP John Hemming, who has campaigned for more openness from social services and the family courts when children are taken into care, said he would write to Tim Loughton, the minister for children, to call for an investigation.

Today a spokesman for Newham said the council was delighted the boy had been found.

Detective Inspector Andy Wardell, from Lincolnshire Police, said: ‘Following extensive and rapid inquiries carried out in partnership with our colleagues in South Yorkshire Police, a 46-year- old woman is now in custody at Skegness police station.

‘We would like to thank the media for their support in this case which has greatly assisted in an excellent result.

‘We are delighted to confirm that the child is safe and well and has been returned to the care of Newham Children’s Services in London.’

Share

Winona Varney was reunited with her mother through Facebook, writes Christopher Booker.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7958099/She-defied-the-law-to-find-her-mother.html#dsq-content

She defied the law to find her mother

Winona Varney was reunited with her mother through Facebook, writes Christopher Booker.

By Christopher Booker
Published: 7:25PM BST 21 Aug 2010

For once, after all the shocking stories I have reported on the secretive system that allows social workers to seize children from loving parents for no good reason, to send them for adoption, I can at last report a story where a family torn apart for nine years has been reunited.

When Winona Varney, now a pretty 16-year-old, recently fell into the arms of her mother Tracey at Truro railway station, they had not seen each other since she was seven. During that time, she and her 12-year-old sister Daniella have been living unhappily with an adoptive family, who repeatedly told them that their mother was a bad woman who did not love or want them. But when, in June, Winona managed to track her mother down, via Facebook, a short time later the two girls and their mother were again living under the same roof.

This harrowing story began back in 1997, when social workers from Cornwall county council received a wholly erroneous tip-off that there might be drugs in the house where Tracey lived with her partner. The day after the birth of their first child, a boy, they were made to sign an agreement that they would “work with social services”. Tracey then had two daughters, Winona and Daniella; but their father, who had been in care himself, had a strong aversion to social workers and eventually threatened one with violence.

On the social workers’ insistence, in order to keep her children, Tracey left her partner. She and they were sent to a mother and child unit in Staffordshire, where she often had to protect them from abuse by other inmates. Eventually, though there was no evidence that Tracey had harmed them in any way, the girls were sent for adoption, on the grounds that they were “at risk of emotional abuse”. They were taken in by a couple in a nearby Cornish village, and Winona was given a new name. (Their brother, however, was returned to his mother, after a year in foster care.)

Year after year, unaware of her daughters’ whereabouts, Tracey sent loving birthday and Christmas cards to them. But this could only be done through social services – who never passed them on. According to Winona, she and her sister were constantly told both by social workers and their adoptive parents that their mother was “a horrible person” who didn’t love them.

Tracey eventually found a new partner with whom she had two more daughters. In June this year, Winona managed to track down her mother through Facebook, and they arranged to meet at Truro station. They couldn’t believe their happiness at being reunited and more secret meetings followed.

When Daniella was told what was going on, she was initially wary, because of the lies she had been told about her mother. But twice the girls escaped at night through windows for further meetings, until eventually Winona rang the adoptive parents to say they were both going back to live with their mother.

Winona is so angry about what has been done to them that she has opened a page on Facebook entitled “Anti-Social Services Forced Adoption – We Can Help!”, to join up with other children in the same plight. She pays tribute to the advice she was given by Ian Josephs, the businessman living in the South of France who, through his Forced Adoption website, has helped hundreds of families who have fallen into the clutches of this corrupt and secretive system.

Not dissimilar was the case of Tammy Coulter, taken away from her mother by Derbyshire social workers when she was only seven months old, after an accident left her with a bruised cheek. After time in foster care, she was put out for adoption by a judge who said that, thanks to delays by the social workers, she and her mother would by now be strangers. Only after 17 years did she find her mother again through the website Genes Reunited, and was able to return happily to her birth family.

In 2006, Tammy told a London audience, which included judges, lawyers and Harriet Harman MP: “Finding out you’ve been adopted is one of the worst feelings in the world, because you feel that all of your identity, everything you’ve known about yourself, is a lie.” She said she was speaking out “on behalf of children and parents who have also been through the secrecy of family courts and the injustices that have taken place, and the devastation of one decision that determines the future of a child”.

After nine years of misery, Winona Varney would agree. She says that after going to college, she wants to get involved in child care – “but certainly not as a social worker, because I have seen what they can do”.

Share

Too white to adopt: Politically-correct town hall officials tell banker and his wife they can’t give a home to a black or Asian child

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1306887/White-couple-told-adopt-black-Asian-child.html

Too white to adopt: Politically-correct town hall officials tell banker and his wife they can’t give a home to a black or Asian child

By Vanessa Allen and Dennis Rice
Last updated at 4:08 AM on 28th August 2010

Cradling her daughter on her knee, Francesca Polini is every inch the loving, caring mother.

She and her banker husband have good incomes, a spacious home and a close network of family and friends.

But their hopes of parenthood were ini­tially dashed when town hall bureaucrats said they were ‘too white’ to adopt a child.

Their rejection meant a child in care was denied the chance of a happy, com­fortable home and a stable future.

And it casts a spotlight on a politically correct adoption system which routinely blocks white couples from giving a home to a child in need.

Mrs Polini, 40, and her husband Rick offered to adopt a black or Asian child, who wait longer for adoption because of a national shortage of ethnic minority couples looking to adopt.

But the couple claim officials in Ealing, West London, told them there was a cap on white parents adopting black or Asian children.

Officially, the council denies such a cap exists, but the case echoes those of other white, middle-class couples who have been barred from adopting for the same reason. Mrs Polini said: ‘The woman didn’t even meet us, she just told us on the phone, “I’m afraid you are too white for us to permit you to adopt one of our children”.

‘There was no assessment, it was based purely on our skin colour, and that shouldn’t be what quali­fies you to adopt. None of this is about the child’s best interests and frankly it’s immoral.’

Faced with their local authori­ty’s refusal to consider them as adoptive parents, the couple had to search abroad for a child to adopt.

Ironically, the same council which had refused their applica­tion to adopt a British child was happy to charge more than £4,000 to vet them for interna­tional adoption.

After overcoming a series of bureaucratic hurdles, they eventu­ally won permission to adopt a girl in Mexico. Gaia, now two, was granted British citizenship last year, and her parents hope to adopt a second child from Mexico.

Currently there are more than 80,000 children and teenagers in care in Britain, and white children are more likely to be adopted than those from ethnic minorities.

Charities including Barnardo’s have called for a radical review of the adoption system, and Mrs Polini is campaigning for an end to ‘caps’ on inter-racial adoption.

The former director of communi­cations at Greenpeace has set up an organisation, Adoption with Humanity, and has written a book about her experiences.

The Department for Children, Schools and Families has apolo­gised to the family for ‘unaccepta­ble and inappropriate’ delays in the handling of their case and has said councils should not bar white cou­ples from adopting black or Asian children.

In a letter to the couple, Ed Balls, then Children’s Secretary, said: ‘We are clear that it is unacceptable for a child to be denied the opportu­nity to grow up in a loving, perma­nent family solely on the grounds that the child and the prospective adopters do not share the same racial or cultural background.

‘These are issues that local authorities should take into account, but they should not act as a “bar” in the way that seems to have happened in your case.’ An Ealing Council spokesman denied it discriminated against white cou­ples, saying: ‘We do not have a pol­icy of same-ethnicity adoption.

‘While an ethnic and cultural match is considered important, it is the overall needs of the child that are given priority, and all potential adopters are considered.

‘Since 2006 we have permanently placed 17 children with families of different ethnic backgrounds, which is 19 per cent of the children placed.’

Share

Adopted, then handed to abusers: Convicted of neglect, cruel couple who loaned girls to paedophiles after duping social workers

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1306108/Couple-loaned-girls-paedophiles-duping-social-workers-convicted.htmlAdopted, then handed to abusers: Convicted of neglect, cruel couple who loaned girls to paedophiles after duping social workers

By James Tozer and Sue Reid
Last updated at 8:04 AM on 26th August 2010

A couple who adopted two young girls and let two paedophiles subject them to horrific sexual abuse were yesterday convicted of child neglect.

The adoptive father, 55 ? who had himself been sexually abusing one of the girls from the age of seven was found guilty on 13 counts of indecent assault and indecency with a child as well as four counts of child neglect.

He was found not guilty of two child-sex charges and one count of neglect by a judge at Minshull Street Crown Court, Manchester, but was remanded in custody for reports.

His wife, 54, was released on bail after being found guilty of five counts of child neglect, but was warned there was a strong possibility she would be jailed.

The couple who cannot be named, to preserve the children’s anonymity allowed convicted child rapist Colin Molloy and his friend Samuel Nelson to abuse the girls in the family home.

Last year Molloy, 46, was jailed indefinitely after admitting nine counts of rape against the younger girl, while Nelson, 43, was jailed for nine years after admitting 11 offences including indecent assault.

Last night an MP called for an independent inquiry into how the system designed to protect the girls failed, while it emerged that the older girl may sue the authority which approved the placement.

Coming from broken, dysfunctional families, adoption was supposed to provide these two young girls with the secure and loving home their birth parents were unable to offer.

Instead it plunged them into a dark and terrifying world of exploitation, violence and rape.

Their adoptive parents, a bus driver and his shop assistant wife, managed to fool Manchester social services into believing they were a decent working-class couple who wanted nothing more than to nurture the children placed in their care.

In fact they were cruel, cynical degenerates.

One of the girls was sexually assaulted by her adoptive father from the age of seven sometimes in the presence of his wife and both were later handed on to two other predatory paedophiles who subjected them to years of rape and assault.

The girls became helpless captives. There was no effective monitoring by social services and when they complained to their adoptive mother, she told them to ‘keep quiet’, even asking the elder girl not to make a fuss as one of the abusers ‘helped us with money and a car’.

The couple, who are not being named in order to protect the girls’ identities, married in 1990. Apparently unable to conceive, they applied to adopt.

Checks at their scruffy ex-council house in Sale, Greater Manchester, and personal vetting failed to uncover the husband’s long association with known parpaedophile Colin Molloy and his associate Samuel Nelson.

They were allowed to adopt the first girl, daughter of a chronic alcoholic mother, in 1999, when she was five. Within two years, the husband was subjecting her to regular sexual abuse, hitting her and leaving her ‘bruised and sore’ if she resisted.

She was too terrified to tell anyone outside the house, and visiting social workers failed to detect anything amiss. Incredibly, they were allowed to adopt a second girl also then five in 2005.

After the second adoption, Molloy and Nelson were regularly entrusted to look after the girls when they had finished school and their adoptive parents were still at work.

Molloy, who persuaded the girls to call him Uncle Colin, had a history of travelling around the country and befriending parents who wanted help looking after their children.

In reality the gardener-cum-handyman was a paedophile who was jailed for seven years for child rape in 1989.

On one occasion, when the older girl was 13, she told her adoptive mother that Nelson was sexually abusing her, but was told: ‘Just leave it, we’ll have to see what happens.’

Molloy, meanwhile, molested the younger girl, then aged just eight, in her sister’s bedroom with their adoptive mother still in the house.

On occasion the adoptive parents would make lame protests at the level of abuse, but their efforts to tackle it were pitiful and never involved calling the police or other authorities.

When they did challenge Nelson about abusing the girls, he left for a while, only to return and give both children presents of pairs of knickers.

The adoptive father told him to apologise, and the baby-sitting arrangement resumed, along with the routine of almost daily abuse.

The trial was also told that the mother also turned a blind eye to the abuse her husband perpetrated against the older girl over a six-year period, even when he molested her in the same room.

The alleged abuse finally came to light last year when one of the girls told a schoolteacher that an ‘uncle’ had been touching her. Police were already hunting for Molloy over two other victims, and the girls were placed in foster care.

The older girl, now aged 16, is said to feel ‘emotionally frozen’ while the girl she still regards as her sister, now ten, frequently bursts into tears.

A relative of the birth mother of the older sister  -  who received her GCSE results this week  -  told the Daily Mail yesterday: ‘It seems clear to us that adequate checks cannot have been done.’

She said the girl’s birth mother, who had a drink problem, had ‘fought like a tigress to keep her’ but ‘lost the will to live’ after her daughter was taken into care and died on Mother’s Day, 2005, aged just 43.

‘Social services should have helped keep this mother and daughter together as a family unit,’ the relative said. ‘Instead, they wrenched the child from her mother. They then handed her through a forced adoption, endorsed by the secret family courts, to a paedophile ring.

‘There is a dangerous culture among social workers. They will take a child from birth parents after making unproven accusations against them and hand that child to adoptive parents who are always deemed to be perfect.’

Another relative of the oldest girl said of the adoptive parents: ‘They are monsters who were trusted by both the girls and they broke that trust. The girls were very brave.

‘If they had not spoken out about what was happening to them, no one would be any the wiser.’

Manchester City Council  -  which authorised the original adoptions  -  said it had commissioned an independent internal assessment which found it had followed proper procedures, but refused to publish it.

Now Lib Dem MP John Hemming, who is campaigning for changes in Britain’s adoption system, has written to Children’s Minister Tim Loughton calling for an independent serious case review.

What planet are they on if they think a secret report will put an end to this?’ he asked.

‘Something has gone dreadfully wrong and we need to know whether complaints about what was happening were ignored.’

Last night Manchester city council’s director of children’s services, Pauline Newman, said: ‘The vast majority of adoptive parents do a fantastic job. This case must not detract from that fact.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1303930/Couple-took-cash-loaning-adopted-girls-paedophiles.html

Couple took cash for ‘loaning adopted girls to paedophiles’

By James Slack
Last updated at 7:14 AM on 18th August 2010

A couple adopted two girls and allowed them to be subjected to horrific sexual abuse in exchange for money, a court heard yesterday.

The man and wife passed a number of checks that allowed them to adopt when the younger girl was just five.

But after two years the husband began to sexually assault her, a jury was told.

Later, allegedly with the full knowledge of the wife, they allowed both girls to be minded after school by a pair of paedophiles, the court heard.

When one of the children told her adoptive mother what was going on, she replied, ‘Just leave it, we’ll have to see what happens’.

She later added that she could do nothing, as one of the men ‘helped us with money and a car’, it is alleged.

One of the abusers, Colin Molloy, now 46, was jailed indefinitely last year for nine counts of raping the younger girl when she was eight. Samuel Nelson, 43, who preyed on the older girl, was given nine years.

Yesterday, the adoptive parents stood trial over their alleged role.

The husband, who along with his wife cannot be named for legal reasons, abused the younger girl over a six-year period, Minshull Street Crown Court, Manchester, heard.

While the sexual assaults were taking place, the couple also started ‘loaning’ the sisters to Molloy and Nelson to abuse them after school, the jury was told.

Prosecutor Michael Lavery said: ‘This couple failed to protect both girls. They gave them to two men who were sexual predators.

‘They were told what was happening to the girls but did nothing.’

The abuse by the adoptive father began when the younger girl was just seven, Mr Lavery alleged.

The couple then began allowing Nelson to look after the girls after school, the court heard, and he began abusing the older girl, who was 13 at the time.

Meanwhile Molloy was given access to the younger girl and subjected her to a campaign of rape and abuse, said Mr Lavery, beginning in 2007 when she was just eight.

The court heard the father apologised to the girl after hurting her but continued to abuse her.

‘He said he loved her and would not hurt her,’ he said.

But the adoptive father then told her ‘I have to get something out of this’ when he continued the abuse, it is alleged.

‘Not only had he exposed her to a paedophile, but he had been abusing her for six years as well,’ said Mr Lavery. The alleged abuse only came to light when one of the girls told a teacher that an ‘uncle’ had been touching her.

The girls were removed from the family home last year.

The older girl, now 16, later told police her adoptive father would beat her if she refused his sexual advances, leaving her ‘bruised and sore’.

‘He said he wanted to have sex with me,’ she told officers in an interview played to the jury.

‘I said, “Why would I want to do that?”

‘He said, “Because I love you.” ‘But I said, “You are supposed to love me as a daughter, not like this. That is not loving someone”.’

The court heard how he even abused her when his wife was in the same room.

The 55-year-old adoptive father denies 15 counts of indecent assault and indecency with a child.

He and his wife, 54, also deny five counts of child neglect.

The case continues.

Share

Judge in charge of family courts criticises ‘arrogant social workers’

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article7095791.ece

From Times Online

April 13, 2010
Judge in charge of family courts criticises ‘arrogant social workers’

Rosemary Bennett, Social Affairs Correspondent

Social workers have been criticised as “arrogant and enthusiastic removers of children from their parents” by the judge who takes charge of the family courts today.

Lord Justice Wall said that the determination of some social workers to place children in an “unsatisfactory care system” away from their families was “quite shocking”.

In a separate case, on which Sir Nicholas Wall also sat, Lord Justice Aikens described the actions of social workers in Devon as “more like Stalin’s Russia or Mao’s China than the West of England”.

The criticism of social workers from two of the most senior family court judges came as the number of children placed in care has reached a record high after the Baby Peter tragedy.

Social workers say that they are not prepared to take any chances after the death of the 17-month-old toddler at the hands of his mother, her lover and their lodger in Haringey, East London. He was being monitored by social workers at the time of his death.

The remarks are likely to be seen as a warning to social workers not to take children into care before all other avenues have been exhausted. They may also be seen as a signal to the family courts to challenge more robustly legal orders to take children into care.

Lord Justice Wall made his comments in a highly critical ruling against Greenwich Council, where social workers had taken two children into care and begun adoption proceedings despite their natural mother’s best efforts to change her life.

The Greenwich case involved a mother known as “EH”, who is seeking the return of her son “R”, aged 5, and daughter “RA”, aged 2, from care.

The children were taken into care in 2008 after the parents had taken RA, then a baby, to hospital, where her left upper arm was found to be broken. Doctors considered that the injuries were not accidental, social services were informed and both children were removed from their parents that day.

Initially they went to live with their maternal grandmother but were moved into foster care after a dispute between the grandmother and their father. Since June last year the father ceased to have any contact with the children and the mother has attempted to separate from him, alleging domestic violence.

Social workers refused to believe that the relationship was over, while rebuffing the mother’s request for help in ending the relationship. Lord Justice Wall described the conduct of the social workers as “hard to credit”.

“Here was a mother who needed and was asking for help to break free from an abusive relationship. She was denied that help abruptly and without explanation. That, in my judgment, is very poor social work practice,” he said.

“What social workers do not appear to understand is that the public perception of their role in care proceedings is not a happy one. They are perceived by many as the arrogant and enthusiastic removers of children from their parents into an unsatisfactory care system, and as trampling on the rights of parents and children in the process. This case will do little to dispel that.”

The adoption order has now been set aside after the ruling made last Friday.

In the Devon case, on which Lord Justice Wall also sat, Lord Justice Aikens criticised the actions of social workers in pursuing plans to have a baby adopted without giving his mother a last chance to show that she could look after him. The Devon legal team was given time to read the Greenwich judgment and withdrew their case.

Lord Justice Wall will be sworn in today as the president of the High Court’s Family Division. Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, originally challenged his appointment. Lord Justice Wall has been an outspoken critic of some government policies, including the funding of family courts.

Share

Adopted – but we didn’t know

http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/jan/02/adoption-children-family

Adopted – but we didn’t know

How does it feel to discover as an adult that you were adopted as a baby? We talk to four people who came to terms with finding out later in life

Kate Hilpern

  • The Guardian, Saturday 2 January 2010Hilary Moon, 60, was 48 when she discovered that she was adopted. She is divorced.

    “I was at my uncle’s funeral when my cousin’s husband wandered up to me and said, ‘I’ve been wanting to meet you, because we’re both adopted.’ It was a huge shock – how could it not be? On the other hand, I had an instant explanation as to why I’d always felt like a square peg in a round hole when it came to my family.

    “I once said to my mother, ‘I’ve always felt like I was found on a doorstep.’ She got terribly upset, and I later learned that was the point at which she confided in my cousin’s husband. She chose him because he’s a vicar. She assumed he’d keep it to himself.

    “My mother had died by the time I found out the truth, but my father hadn’t, so I asked him about it. He was an unpleasant man and simply said, ‘Well, nobody else would have you.’ I threw a cup of tea at him, said that at least it meant I wasn’t related to him and we never spoke again.

    “Was I angry? Of course I was. I had been advised not to have children because my mother and brother had both had severe diabetes and had gone blind and died early. To learn I wasn’t blood-related to them means I made an enormous decision based on fiction.

    “I’ve mellowed now. My mother had such a bum deal in life – a husband that had affairs and a son who died young – that it’s hard to feel anger towards her. She and I got on well, and I’m thankful for that. And although I still have negative feelings towards my father, who is now dead, I think that’s probably more to do with how he treated my mother.

    “About eight years ago, my biological sister sought me out. She put me in touch with my birth mother, to whom I look incredibly similar. I’ve met others in the extended family, too, and I even changed my full name to what it was before the adoption. With all my adoptive family dead, and a large birth family still alive, it just made sense to me. But, actually, they’re a funny lot and I can’t say I feel any great bond with them.

    “The whole situation has left me feeling neither part of my adoptive nor my biological family, and the lack of a sense of belonging in either can make me feel lonely if I let it. When people ask me who is my next of kin, I say, ‘I haven’t got one’, because that’s how it feels.”

    Mandy Sullivan, 52, is divorced with three grown-up children. She found out she was adopted when she was 36.

    “I’ve never had a good relationship with my mum. She had a baby that died at a week old and from very young I realised I could never replace that baby. But one day, when I was 36, something else came to light that further explained things – I wasn’t even hers.

    “I found out by chance. I became a mature student and the university administration office requested my birth certificate. I’d never seen it and my mum kept saying she couldn’t find it. In the end, she gave me a piece of paper that I duly showed the university office. The administrator looked at me and said, ‘This isn’t your birth certificate.’ She must have registered that I didn’t understand and explained, ‘I’m sorry to tell you this, but it’s your adoption certificate.’

    “I felt sick. My whole life had been a lie. It was horrendous and not helped by the fact that I was right in the middle of a bad divorce and my house was being repossessed. I didn’t do anything about it for three or four years. I thought about it constantly but I felt I had to prioritise finding a job, moving house and settling my three daughters.

    “Eventually, I wrote my mum a letter. I thought, I can’t just ring her up and blurt it out because she’d get defensive. She got defensive anyway. In a short, sharp tone, she said my dad didn’t want me to know because he was afraid of me feeling rejected and different. I believe her – my dad and I were very close until he died when I was 25. But I don’t accept that it was all him. It must have been a joint decision. She said she planned to write it in a letter that I’d get after she died, but what a cop out.

    “Our relationship has continued to go downhill since that letter. The main thing she seemed concerned about was that her relationship with my daughters didn’t suffer. A few years ago, when she had a massive stroke, I felt we might be getting a bit closer, but as soon as she was on the mend the old barriers went up. These days she doesn’t want much to do with me.

     ”About 10 years ago, I decided to apply for my adoption file. It’s funny – despite always feeling different to my adoptive family (I’m tall, they’re not. I’m a bookworm, they don’t read books at all), I remember still thinking the social worker might come in and say it was all a big mistake – that I wasn’t adopted at all. But, of course, she didn’t.

    “I didn’t discover much more than what my mother had divulged, however – that my adoptive father had been in the pub having a drink with a friend, who said that his sister-in-law couldn’t cope with her baby. Apparently, my dad came home and asked my mum, ‘Why don’t we adopt her?’

    “I’ve never looked for my birth mother. I don’t think I could cope with another mum rejecting me. But I’m in quite poor health and increasingly worried that it’s hereditary, so I think I might get in touch just to find out my medical history.

    “Every area of my life has been affected by what I found out. I have great problems trusting people – both men and friends – and once I do trust someone, I seem to find it really hard to say goodbye, even if the relationship is really rubbish. On a positive note, I’m closer than ever to my daughters – they’re the only blood relations I know.”

    Chris Lines, 63, is married with three grown-up children and one granddaughter. He found out that he was adopted three years ago.

     ”My wife and I were in a local garden centre when I spotted the daughter of my mum’s next-door neighbour. She was with a little girl, who she introduced as one of her three grandchildren. The other two, she explained, were adopted from Vietnam. She turned to the girl and said, ‘This man was adopted too, you know.’

    My wife and I looked around to see who she was talking about. She felt awful – she thought I knew. It turned out she still remembered going in the taxi with her mum and my mum to pick up a five-month-old baby – me – from the Salvation Army all those years ago.

     ”The way I deal with most problems is to deny their existence. I didn’t want to think about it, but my wife prompted me to check the official birth records in Liverpool and, sure enough, my name wasn’t there.

    “With both my parents dead, I approached two elderly aunts. They knew all about the adoption, and even told me my original name – Dennis Kelly. The moment I heard that name was when it really hit me. My legs gave way. I felt I’d lived for 61 years as one person, but really I was another.

    “It turned out everyone in my adoptive family knew. I’m still amazed nobody told me because it’s a huge and close family. They’ve all since said they thought I’d been told. My mother had an ectopic pregnancy and was advised not to get pregnant again, so she doted on me as her only child. I think they felt that if I discovered I was adopted, I might look for my real parents and they’d have to share me or even lose me.

    “I did decide to look for my biological parents. It struck me that the only blood relations I knew were my own children. Even though I used the charity After Adoption, it was a long search because when we found out that I was born in a home for “wayward mothers”, we assumed my mother had been young. Then we discovered she’d been 39.

    “I was sad to learn that she had died, but I did find a cousin who agreed to meet me. When he produced a box with four or five photos of my mother, I was speechless. There she was, smiling and laughing. She really did exist. Another relative I later found, remembered her as larger than life and always smiling. I liked hearing that.

    “It might sound funny, but a big relief to me was that I had been born in Liverpool and that I have Irish blood in me – both things I’d been brought up to believe and am fiercely proud of. What isn’t true, however, are all the little genetic links I’d always taken for granted – my youngest daughter having my aunt’s eyes; my eldest daughter having her grandmother’s legs.

    “I think I’d rather not know I’m adopted, but it has helped explain some things – for example, why I sometimes felt as a child that I wasn’t quite the same as the other children in the family. Also, one of my aunts told me that when my parents got me I didn’t make any noise, presumably because, for the first five months of my life, nobody had come when I cried. I wonder if that’s why I’ve always been quite introverted.”

    Peter Clark, 61, was 39 when he found out he was adopted. He is married and has four sons and five grandchildren.

    “The thing I remember most about the day I found out that my mother didn’t give birth to me, was this feeling of standing with my back to the edge of a cliff because everything behind me – everything I’d known to be true – felt as if it was a lie and I literally didn’t know who I was.

    “It even made me question the right to have my father’s war medals. As the eldest of five children, I’d been in possession of them. I took them out of the drawer by my bed that night and felt it was wrong for me to have them, because he wasn’t my real dad.

    “I don’t think my parents ever intended to tell me. My mother says it’s because I was a sensitive child and they didn’t want to upset me. When I asked her why she still didn’t tell me in adulthood, she said she gave my father, who had died when I was 21, a deathbed promise to keep the secret. I think the real reason was a fear that I would abandon her in favour of my birth family. Even when my mother did finally tell me I was adopted, the first thing she asked me was never to make contact with my birth mother.

    “She finally told me just before I went on an overseas business trip. There were some complications over my visa and passport, which prompted questions around my birth certificate and the identity of my parents. It must have made my mum panic.

    “I was gobsmacked because I’d never had any inkling. It’s not as if adoption is taboo in our family. One of my brothers adopted four children and my wife’s brother adopted three. I felt very angry with her about the web of deception for a long time and although I’ve worked through that now, I still hold a strong belief that people have a fundamental right to know about their origins.

    “I realised I needed to know my roots. It wasn’t easy – the search for my birth mother took six years. I had an unconscious fear of rejection, so I’d make some progress in finding her, then take a step back. She was also hard to find. Even with the help of an adoption charity, it took a couple of hundred phone calls and many letters to find her.

    “My first meeting with Agnes, when I eventually found her living in the United States, went wonderfully, and although she never acknowledged who I was to her friends and family – which I found hard – we continued a warm relationship until she died in 1996. About two years later, I plucked up the courage to search for other members of my birth family and I’m now in contact with my cousins, aunts and uncles too – although, sadly, I was never able to get any information about my father.

     ”It’s good to know where I came from, although I have no regrets about being adopted and my adoptive family feels no less my family than before. Three of my siblings say it doesn’t make them feel any differently towards me.

     ”Sadly, one of my brothers – who, I learned last year, was the only one who knew before me that I was adopted – doesn’t feel like this. But we have a difficult relationship for other reasons. One of my other brothers recently had my father’s watch repaired and said he felt I should have it. Given how I’d felt about the war medals, it was a significant gesture.”

     Some names have been changed

  • Share